Ultrivia The Football Quiz
Inter 5–2 Roma: Lautaro Martínez Scores Twice on Injury Return as Inter Go Nine Points Clear in Serie A

Inter 5–2 Roma: Lautaro Martínez Scores Twice on Injury Return as Inter Go Nine Points Clear in Serie A

By , April 6, 2026

Tags: serie a

Inter Milan 5–2 AS Roma · Serie A Matchday 31 · Stadio Giuseppe Meazza · April 5, 2026

Lautaro Martínez had been absent since February. His hamstring had cost him seven weeks, a handful of critical matches, and — briefly — some genuine anxiety about whether Inter’s title charge had lost its most dangerous piece. He answered every question on Saturday evening in the space of 58 minutes, scoring twice, terrorising Roma’s backline from the first second of the match, and leaving the Meazza to a standing ovation before the hour mark.

The numbers underneath the performance tell an even stranger story. Inter scored five goals from an xG of just 1.17 — one of the most extreme overperformances of the Serie A season. By every probabilistic measure, this should have been a 1-0 or 2-0. Instead, it was five. The difference between the model and the scoreboard is the difference between an average Inter and the Inter that showed up on Saturday: clinical, direct, and anchored by a striker who reminded everyone in 58 minutes why he is still the most important player at this club.

Match summary: Inter 5–2 Roma

Inter scored five goals from just 1.17 expected goals (xG), one of the most extreme finishing overperformances of the Serie A season.

Key Match Stats

A match decided in 60 seconds

Cristian Chivu deployed a 3-5-2 with Martínez alongside Thuram in attack — the partnership that had driven Inter’s Serie A campaign before the injury break. Gian Piero Gasperini lined Roma up in a 3-4-2-1, with Malen as the lone striker and Soulé and Pellegrini in the creative roles behind him.

The match was settled before Roma had touched the ball in their own half. Sixty seconds elapsed, Thuram collected on the left shoulder of Roma’s backline, turned his man with a single movement, and rolled the ball across for Martínez to arrive at pace and fire into the roof of the net with his right foot. The whole thing took four passes. Roma were already chasing.

What followed was a first half of two completely different matches. For thirty-nine minutes after the opener, Roma competed. They pressured Inter’s build-up, won second balls, and created two genuine chances — Malen’s close-range header tipped over by Sommer in the 24th minute was the best Roma moment of the evening. Then, in the 40th minute, Gianluca Mancini rose ahead of Thuram at the back post from Devyne Rensch’s cross and headed in to level. The Meazza went quiet.

The silence lasted exactly three minutes.

Çalhanoglu’s thunderbolt and a half-time turning point

In the second minute of stoppage time, Piotr Zielinski played a short ball into Hakan Çalhanoglu’s feet 30 yards from goal. Roma’s midfield had stepped up to press. Çalhanoglu took one touch to set his body and drove a right-footed strike that never deviated from its path — straight into the top-left corner over Svilar’s dive. It was the kind of goal that doesn’t just restore a lead. It takes the life out of an opposition.

Inter went into half-time 2-1 up with the momentum entirely on their side. The xG at that point barely reflected the control they had exerted: Roma’s equaliser had come from a set-piece routine, not from dismantling Inter’s defensive structure. Çalhanoglu’s goal, from a low-probability position, had been a pure quality execution. The numbers said 1-1 was fair. The football said something different.

The second half: how Inter dismantled Roma’s 3-4-2-1

Chivu made no changes at half-time. The message was clear: the structure was working. It took seven minutes for it to show.

A diagonal ball from Thuram picked out Martínez running in behind Roma’s line. The Inter captain’s first touch took him past Mancini — who had just gone off injured, replaced by Daniele Ghilardi at the break — and his lofted finish over the on-rushing Svilar was the composure of a player who had not missed a beat in seven weeks away from the pitch. 3-1. The Meazza erupted.

Two minutes later, the match was over as a contest. Çalhanoglu’s corner delivery found Thuram arriving at the far post, and the Frenchman’s glancing header — redirected with precision into the top right corner — was as good a set-piece goal as Serie A has produced this weekend. Thuram had now assisted two goals and scored one in 55 minutes, a contribution that his 9.3 API rating barely overstates.

Barella added the fifth in the 63rd minute with characteristic determination — bursting into the box after a blocked Soulé effort fell loose, keeping his balance through three tackles, and finishing into the top-left corner with his weaker foot. It was a goal that encapsulated everything Barella represents at this club: technical quality applied under physical duress, at exactly the moment the match had already been won and lesser players switch off.

Lorenzo Pellegrini pulled one back in the 70th minute with a tidy low drive from the centre of the box — more consolation than context — but by then Chivu had already begun rotating, removing Martínez, Thuram, and Çalhanoglu to preserve them for the week ahead.

The xG story: when the numbers can’t keep up

Inter’s xG of 1.17 for five goals is worth pausing on. It means the model expected fewer than two goals from Inter’s 17 shots. The actual return was five. That’s not a rounding error — it’s a statement about finishing quality.

Every Inter goal was well-taken. Martínez’s first was struck first-time at pace into a corner. His second was a composed chip over a advancing keeper. Çalhanoglu’s strike hit exactly where he aimed it. Thuram’s header was redirected with technique, not luck. Barella’s finish was controlled under pressure. None of these were particularly high-xG chances. All of them were converted by players who are, at their best, among the most clinical finishers in European football.

This is precisely what the xG model cannot tell you: that a team with world-class finishers will routinely outperform their shot profile. Inter have done it all season. It is not randomness — it is a structural feature of a squad built around Martínez, Thuram, and Çalhanoglu in the half-spaces.

What does 1.17 xG for 5 goals mean?

Expected Goals (xG) measures the probability of a shot resulting in a goal.

Scoring 5 goals from 1.17 xG is extremely rare and indicates:

This level of overperformance is usually not sustainable over time. Read our article about xG and what they mean: What is Expected Goals (xG)?

What this means for the title race

Inter move nine points clear of AC Milan, who play Napoli on Monday. The gap has become a cushion, and the cushion is becoming a coronation. This was the ninth time Inter have scored at least five goals against Roma in Serie A — four more occasions than any other opponent against the Giallorossi in the top flight. The statistic says something about Inter’s quality. It says something else about Roma’s structural problems against elite pressing sides.

For Gasperini’s side, the defeat is a reminder that their 3-4-2-1 system — effective against mid-table opposition — leaves them exposed to teams who can isolate their centre-backs in one-versus-one situations. Mancini’s injury (forced off at half-time) and the subsequent defensive reorganisation made a difficult evening considerably worse. Their season now hinges on the Europa League.

For Inter, the calculation is simple: protect the lead, manage minutes, bring Martínez through to the end of the season in one piece. Saturday evening suggested all three are achievable.

Player ratings

Inter Milan

Sommer (6.6) — Made the one save that mattered, a sharp stop from Malen’s close-range header in the 24th minute. Largely untroubled otherwise, which is exactly what his defenders ensured.

Akanji (7.0) — Composed and authoritative at right centre-back. Three tackles, 4 duels won from 6. The kind of performance that never draws attention because nothing goes wrong.

Acerbi (6.2) — A quieter evening by his standards, with Roma offering little in transition through his channel. Commanded the backline without incident.

Bastoni (6.2) — Three fouls committed in 58 minutes before being replaced by Darmian at the hour mark — slightly underpowered against Roma’s movement in the first half, but never genuinely beaten.

Dumfries (6.3) — Energetic on the right but ultimately peripheral. Two shots, neither on target. His attacking output has been inconsistent since the international break.

Barella (8.0) — The fifth goal was his, and it was magnificent, but his contribution ran much deeper: 61 passes, continuous pressing in midfield, and the engine work that allows Çalhanoglu to operate higher up the pitch. His duels tell the story — 3 won from 7, which undersells the intensity he brought.

Çalhanoglu (8.6) — One goal, one assist, 6 key passes, 6 duels won from 7 in 67 minutes. The thunderbolt into the top corner just before half-time was the moment that decisively broke Roma’s spirit. Replaced by Sučić in the 67th minute with the match already done.

Zielinski (7.5) — The layoff for Çalhanoglu’s goal was perfectly weighted, and his defensive contribution was strong: 4 tackles, all 7 duels won. An excellent performance in a role that often goes unnoticed.

Dimarco (7.0) — Six key passes, 4 interceptions, and the corner delivery for Thuram’s header. The most creative defensive player on the pitch, which remains a contradiction only Dimarco can consistently resolve.

Thuram (9.3) — 1 goal, 2 assists, 3 key passes in 66 minutes. The assist for the opener and the lay-off for Martínez’s second required the kind of spatial awareness that cannot be coached. His glancing header for 4-1 was technically superb. Substituted with Inter 5-1 up and the match long settled. Barely 25 words in a report could do justice to this performance.

Martínez (8.7) — Two goals from three shots, all three on target, in 58 minutes after seven weeks out. The first arrived after 60 seconds. The second, a composed chip over Svilar, confirmed immediately that the injury had taken nothing. Captain, talisman, and the decisive reason Inter are nine points clear. Managed carefully with a substitution at the hour mark — the right decision, even on a night like this.

Substitutes: Darmian (6.5) — tidy cameo on the right side of the backline. Bonny (6.3) — limited touches, worked hard. Esposito (6.5) — sharp in his 24 minutes, drew Svilar’s save in the 80th minute. Sučić (n/r).

AS Roma

Svilar (6.5) — Four saves in a match that was ultimately decided by Inter’s clinical finishing rather than by Roma’s lack of attack. Faced 9 shots on target and conceded 5 — his goals-prevented figure was -2, suggesting he kept the score from reaching eight. Not his fault.

Mancini (6.5) — Headed in Roma’s equaliser from a corner, which was the best moment of Roma’s evening. Went off injured at half-time. His contribution to the defensive shape before that — particularly getting ahead of Thuram for the header — showed his quality at set pieces even on a difficult night.

Ndicka (5.5) — Caught too high for Inter’s third goal, beaten by Martínez’s run in behind. Struggled with Inter’s pace in transition throughout the second half.

Hermoso (5.5) — Replaced at 81 minutes. Lost the physical battle against Thuram on several occasions in the first half, couldn’t recover shape quickly enough in the second.

Çelik (6.0) — Provided the cross for Mancini’s goal — his best contribution. Defensively outgunned by Dimarco’s creativity on Inter’s left side.

Cristante (5.5) — Two fouls in the first five minutes set a combative tone he couldn’t sustain. Overwhelmed in the central areas as Inter’s midfield superiority became complete.

Pisilli (5.5) — Booked in the 60th minute for a foul on Thuram. His pressing was aggressive without ever being effective against Inter’s quick rotations.

Rensch (6.5) — The assist for Mancini’s equaliser was well-delivered, and his forward runs were Roma’s most consistent attacking outlet before the 3-1. Replaced by Tsimikas at 58 minutes.

Soulé (6.0) — A half-chance blocked in the 59th minute was his best moment. Physically outmatched against Inter’s defensive athleticism, but creative in the tight spaces where Roma gave him ball.

Pellegrini (6.5) — His late goal was a composed finish into the bottom left corner — the right technique for the chance, taken cleanly. On a different evening, his combination play with Soulé might have produced more. Replaced by El Shaarawy in the 64th minute.

Malen (6.5) — His close-range header in the 24th minute, denied by Sommer’s sharp stop, was Roma’s best chance of the match. Active and physical as a lone striker against two of Serie A’s best centre-backs. Could not be blamed for the margin of defeat.

Substitutes: Ghilardi (6.0) — came on for the injured Mancini at half-time, solid in limited time. Tsimikas (5.5) — overrun in his cameo. El Shaarawy (6.0) — bright but too late.

Test your knowledge

Think you understood this match?

👉 Try our Inter vs Roma quiz on Ultrivia and challenge your football knowledge.

Written by Wandrille P — football analyst specializing in data-driven match analysis and creator of Ultrivia.